— Tom Clark 2021/12/06 11:18

Dems Could End Abortion Crisis – But WON’T
by Jimmy Dore via Youtube

Jimmy Dore and Max Blumenthal lament how the Democrats are so weak that they can't stop the country from protecting unborn babies. Honestly, this stuff just makes me sick.

I bought into the feminist/hedonist propaganda for a long time, I sort of took the position that abortion was regrettable but who am I to tell a woman what to do – that's between her and her values – but my opinion changed. Not sure exactly when, sometime in my early 40s maybe? I think it's when I took a hard look at the damage that feminism had done to marriage and the relationship between men and women. What makes it okay for a woman to terminate a child, but if a man forces a woman to abort his child then that parent's preference becomes evil? Because it's her body? What about the child's body?

The law protects us from being killed even if it were convenient to do so. It doesn't matter if you are a cop, a family member, a clergyman, etc. you don't get to off folks out of convenience. You don't get to off people that aren't productive in society. The law says, does it not, that innocent people have a right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? Eventually, I came to the conclusion I should have always had, that an unborn child is nevertheless a human being, and it's wrong to kill human beings for the mere sake of convenience. And even though it took me a long time to get to the sanctity of life conclusion, it just makes me sick that people hold my previous and downright wicked view on the rights of unborn children.

It seems anyone heavily influenced by communism or feminism is going to discount the sanctity of unborn children. They treat babies like disposable commodities rather than the wonder they are. And it's now, the main reason that people of decency need to speak out against commmunism, feminism, and other cults of death.

Speaking of communism (tyranny by the majority), listen to Marxist Max go off on the U.S. Supreme Court:

Here are his main points:

1. The Supreme Court is anti-democratic;
2. it's prone to political manipulations, and
3. the Democrats aren't lackadaisical in attacking its integrity.

Yeah, the whole structure of the U.S. republic is that it is not a direct democracy. Now, I ask you the reader, how many nations can you name that are a direct democracy? China? Cuba? North or South Korea? Australia? Iceland? Venezuala? Let me give you a hint here – the number is less than 1 and equal to 0. Anyone that pretends that a direct democracy is ideal or even feasible applied to any large population is a propagandist or a first class moron.