★ WELCOME ★

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision 		Previous revision
articles:politics:20121202-joe-rogan-proves-climate-alarmists-are-correct [2021/12/06 06:40]
tom ↷ Page moved from shows:politics:20121202-joe-rogan-proves-climate-alarmists-are-correct to politics:20121202-joe-rogan-proves-climate-alarmists-are-correct 		articles:politics:20121202-joe-rogan-proves-climate-alarmists-are-correct [2021/12/11 15:12] (current)
tom ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation
Line 5: Line 5:
 {{youtube>OED7AXzTPRA?medium}} {{youtube>OED7AXzTPRA?medium}}
 **Stephen Pinker on What Has Happened to Being Rational\\ **Stephen Pinker on What Has Happened to Being Rational\\
-by [[politics:personalities:Joe Rogan|Joe Rogan]] via Youtube**+by [[articles:politics:personalities:joe-rogan|Joe Rogan]] via Youtube**
  
 In this video Joe Rogan makes fun of climate deniers asking one "How much research have you done?" Joe and his guest, Stephen Pinker, talk about the biggest predictor of being a climate alarmist denier has to do with being on the right. In this video Joe Rogan makes fun of climate deniers asking one "How much research have you done?" Joe and his guest, Stephen Pinker, talk about the biggest predictor of being a climate alarmist denier has to do with being on the right.
Line 13: Line 13:
 Also, there was a lot more green on the earth when there was more CO2 in the atmosphere. In fact, often greenhouses use CO2 to help plants flourish. So higher CO2 is healthier for wildlife (up to a point) and since the earth has come down from much higher CO2 levels in the past, why are we worried about it before we get to even being close to the great CO2 levels that made life flourish in the past? Also, there was a lot more green on the earth when there was more CO2 in the atmosphere. In fact, often greenhouses use CO2 to help plants flourish. So higher CO2 is healthier for wildlife (up to a point) and since the earth has come down from much higher CO2 levels in the past, why are we worried about it before we get to even being close to the great CO2 levels that made life flourish in the past?
  
-[[politics:personalities:tony heller|Tony Heller]] has a great Youtube library and he's been exposing the lies of climate alarmists for a long time. Here's a couple of videos just to give you a flavor as to the baloney that climate alarmists and the captured media love to peddle.+[[articles:politics:personalities:tony-heller|Tony Heller]] has a great Youtube library and he's been exposing the lies of climate alarmists for a long time. Here's a couple of videos just to give you a flavor as to the baloney that climate alarmists and the captured media love to peddle.
  
 {{youtube>vcAHdmYs0j0?medium}} {{youtube>vcAHdmYs0j0?medium}}
 **World's Worst Scientist?\\ **World's Worst Scientist?\\
-by [[politics:personalities:tony-heller|Tony Heller]] via Youtube**+by [[articles:politics:personalities:tony-heller|Tony Heller]] via Youtube**
  
 {{youtube>YUV8U3yBJ6U?medium}} {{youtube>YUV8U3yBJ6U?medium}}
 **Twice as Fast\\ **Twice as Fast\\
-by [[politics:personalities:tony-heller|Tony Heller]] via Youtube**+by [[articles:politics:personalities:tony-heller|Tony Heller]] via Youtube**
  
 {{youtube>W9xCWDZmUT4?medium}} {{youtube>W9xCWDZmUT4?medium}}
 **Most Dishonest Science in 1,200 Years\\ **Most Dishonest Science in 1,200 Years\\
-by [[politics:personalities:tony-heller|Tony Heller]] via Youtube**+by [[articles:politics:personalities:tony-heller|Tony Heller]] via Youtube**
  
-And here's a couple of articles from [[politics:personalities:michael-shellenberger|Michael Shellenberger]] an environmental activist that is calling out the alarmists for the misinformation they pump out:+And here's a couple of articles from [[articles:politics:personalities:michael-shellenberger|Michael Shellenberger]] an environmental activist that is calling out the alarmists for the misinformation they pump out:
  
 [[https://web.archive.org/web/20211122003716/https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelshellenberger/2019/11/25/why-everything-they-say-about-climate-change-is-wrong/#166b581612d6|Why Apocalyptic Claims About Climate Change Are Wrong]] [[https://web.archive.org/web/20211122003716/https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelshellenberger/2019/11/25/why-everything-they-say-about-climate-change-is-wrong/#166b581612d6|Why Apocalyptic Claims About Climate Change Are Wrong]]
Line 33: Line 33:
 [[https://web.archive.org/web/20211128113736/https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelshellenberger/2019/12/04/why-climate-alarmism-hurts-us-all/|Why Climate Alarmism Hurts Us All]] [[https://web.archive.org/web/20211128113736/https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelshellenberger/2019/12/04/why-climate-alarmism-hurts-us-all/|Why Climate Alarmism Hurts Us All]]
  
-So to Joe Rogan and Stephen Pinker and the like-minded: Please address the claims made by [[politics:personalities:tony-heller|Tony Heller]] and [[politics:personalities:michael-shellenberger|Michael Shellenberger]] and myself. If anyone can poke holes in the factual information, conclusions, and questions skeptics have, I'm all ears. But I'll be damned if I'll be convinced that climbing  out of dangerously and historically low CO2 levels constitutes anything but positive news for the planet. Yes, higher CO2 levels may end up being a problem for some areas of the globe, but if this is a global catastrophe, then it has to be a net loss in food and wildlife levels does it not? Otherwise, globally-speaking, it's a boon.+So to Joe Rogan and Stephen Pinker and the like-minded: Please address the claims made by [[articles:politics:personalities:tony-heller|Tony Heller]] and [[articles:politics:personalities:michael-shellenberger|Michael Shellenberger]] and myself. If anyone can poke holes in the factual information, conclusions, and questions skeptics have, I'm all ears. But I'll be damned if I'll be convinced that climbing  out of dangerously and historically low CO2 levels constitutes anything but positive news for the planet. Yes, higher CO2 levels may end up being a problem for some areas of the globe, but if this is a global catastrophe, then it has to be a net loss in food and wildlife levels does it not? Otherwise, globally-speaking, it's a boon.
  
 Now if we get to a point where CO2 is getting close to historically high levels, then we need to start worrying, but until then CO2 emissions by civilization seems to be doing the world a favor. Yes, I think it is wise to keep an eye on what's going on, but I only see good things going on with the climate. So how am I wrong? Now if we get to a point where CO2 is getting close to historically high levels, then we need to start worrying, but until then CO2 emissions by civilization seems to be doing the world a favor. Yes, I think it is wise to keep an eye on what's going on, but I only see good things going on with the climate. So how am I wrong?
  
  

Trace:

Print/export